For
thousands of years, human beings have sought to understand the forces which
make them ill and the ways in which an individual’s health can be restored.
Today, the field of medicine, firmly rooted in science and technology, is
capable of diagnosing and curing a multitude of illnesses and injuries which in
the past would have often condemned a person to death. However, a number of
individuals point to the fact that in a rush towards the scientific, we may be
leaving an important facet of medical care behind.
In
recent years, a number of medical professionals and industry observers have
highlighted the potential importance of spirituality and/or religion in medical
practice. It is first important to note, however, that the terms
“spirituality” and “religion” are in many cases not interchangeable. In an
article on spirituality in cancer care, for example, the National Cancer
Institute outlines the difference between the two terms:
The terms spirituality and religion are often used
in place of each other, but for many people they have different meanings.
Religion may be defined as a specific set of beliefs and practices, usually
within an organized group. Spirituality may be defined as an individual’s
sense of peace, purpose, and connection to others, and beliefs about the
meaning of life. Spirituality may be found and expressed through an organized
religion or in other ways. Patients may think of themselves as spiritual or
religious or both.
Many
medical professionals and researchers are interested in spirituality as it
interacts with the medical profession - an interest that could have
far-reaching consequences. By 2008, in fact, approximately two-thirds of the
medical schools in the U.S. offered courses focused on the role of spirituality
in medicine. Of
these schools, three quarters required their students to take at least one
course on the topic.
So
is spirituality truly relevant in patient care? Well, religious and spiritual
variables have been associated with a variety of health-related outcomes in the
literature, including (but not limited to) lower mortality levels in healthy
individuals, improved recovery after surgery, lower levels of drug and
cigarette use, lower blood pressure, and lower
levels of health care utilization. In
a 2000 essay published in the Journal of the American Medical Association,
Dr. Harold Koenig of the Duke Medical School Center for Spirituality, Theology
and Health reported that out of 350 studies that have examined religious
involvement and health, the majority indicated that religious people lead
healthier lifestyles and are healthier, while at the same time require fewer
health services (though other authors contend that many articles commonly cited as addressing
the relation between religious involvement and health are either irrelevant to
claims of health advantage associated with religious activity or are not
methodologically sound). In
a 2003 review of studies on the topic that the authors judged to be of
sufficient methodological soundness, Powell, Shahabi, et al. concluded that healthy
church/service attendees had a consistent, robust, and prospective reduction in
risk of dying, though the authors failed to find consistent evidence for some other
hypotheses, such as the judgments that religion or spirituality slowed the
progression of cancer or speeded a patient’s recovery after an acute illness.
Research
also indicates that many doctors feel that religion and spirituality influence
patient’s health. In a 2007 study of 1,144 U.S. physicians age 65 and younger
from all specialties, 56 percent of physicians indicated that they believed
that religion and spirituality have a significant influence on health.
While few doctors believed that religion and spirituality help to prevent
“hard” medical outcomes such as heart attacks or death, over three quarters of
those surveyed indicated that faith helps patients cope, and a similar
percentage indicated that it gives patients a positive state of mind.
Moreover, over half of those surveyed said spirituality provides emotional and
practical support.
Medical
professionals should take note of the potentially harmful side of religion
and/or spirituality as it relates to health outcomes as well. Patients can
sometimes refuse medical treatment based on their religious beliefs. Moreover,
the type of “coping” individuals employ appears to have an effect on health
outcomes and/or individual quality of life in some studies. Coping is at times
segmented into “positive” versus “negative.” Positive coping methods reflect a
sense of connectedness with a religious community and a sense of a benevolent
purpose to life, and a sense of secure bond with God and include prayer,
compassionate religious judgments of negative conditions, and forgiveness.,
On the other hand, negative coping methods reflect a more tenuous relationship
with God, a more gloomy view of life and include behaviors such as attributing events
and/or conditions to some form of punishment.
Negative
coping has been linked to negative outcomes in some studies. In a study of
religious coping and quality of life among 170 patients with advanced cancer,
Tarakeshwar, Vanderwerker et al. found that greater use of positive coping
methods was related to better overall quality of life, while greater use of
negative coping was associated with worse overall quality of life.
In a separate study, Pargament, Koenig et al. followed 268 medically ill, hospitalized
patients in a two-year longitudinal study and found that positive coping
methods were generally associated with improvements in health, while negative
coping methods were predictive of declines in health.
A significant number of patients have indicated in
prior studies that they want physicians or other health professionals to have
knowledge of their spiritual and/or religious beliefs, although different
studies have yielded substantially different results. As McCord, Gilchrist, et
al. noted in their 2004 Annals of Family Medicine article, outpatient
studies have found that anywhere between 13 and 73 percent of patients want
physicians to have knowledge of their spiritual or religious beliefs. In their
survey of consenting patients in four family practice residency sites and one
private group practice in Ohio, McCord, Gilchrist et al. found that 83 percent
of respondents indicated that they wanted physicians to ask about spiritual
beliefs in at least some instances. Moreover,
the percentage of those patients welcoming spiritual inquiry seemed to increase
with the severity of the illness. Seventy-seven percent of respondents
indicated that they would welcome spiritual discussion in the event of some
life-threatening illness, but only 43 percent indicated that spiritual
discussion would be welcome during a medical history consult or an initial
visit to the doctor, and only 7 percent indicated that they would welcome a
discussion during a routine physical/check up.
Additional studies support the idea that a patient’s
desire to discuss spirituality is related to the severity of patient
injury/illness. In a survey of patients in six primary care clinics in three
states (North Carolina, Florida, and Vermont), MacLean, Susi, et al. found that
the number of patients who would welcome a spiritual inquiry increased as the
severity of illness increased. Thirty-three percent would welcome a spiritual
inquiry in an office visit, while 40 percent would do so in a hospitalization
setting, and 70 percent would do so in a terminal situation. Likewise, in a study noted by
McCord, Gilchrist, et al., Maugans and Wadland found that physicians report
religious inquiries only 4 percent of the time evaluating minor illnesses, 45
percent of the time evaluating major illnesses, and 69 percent of the time
counseling terminal patients.
If
a health professional does decide to attempt to address a patient’s spiritual
beliefs, care should, of course, be taken to do so in a professional,
courteous, and respectful manner. Recommendations abound for methods to deal
with a patient’s spiritual issues. Thomas McCormick, a faculty member in the
University of Washington School of Medicine’s Department of Medical History and
Ethics, observes health professionals can take a “spiritual history” which can
often be introduced by simply stating something like the following:
As physicians, (or, as physicians-in-training,) we
have discovered that many of our patients have strong spiritual or religious
beliefs that have a bearing on their perceptions of illness and their preferred
modes of treatment. If you are comfortable discussing this with me, I would
like to hear from you about any beliefs or practices that you would want me to
know as your care giver.
In
this manner, if the patient answers in the affirmative, the physician can then
follow up with additional questions on the topic.
However, if a patient responds with “no” or “none,” this is a clear signal to
the physician to move on.
In
addition, various mnemonics exist to assist in framing an approach to spiritual
history taking. Todd Maugans offers the SPIRIT mnemonic, which he defines in
an Archives of Family Medicine article as a consideration of the
patient’s Spiritual Belief System, Personal Spirituality, Integration
and Involvement in a Spiritual Community, Ritualized Practices and
Restrictions, Implications for Medical Care, and Terminal Events
Planning.
Another mnemonic proposed by Anandarajah and Hight in the journal American
Family Physician (2001) is the HOPE mnemonic, in which “‘H’ stands for
sources of hope, meaning, comfort, strength, peace, love and connection; ‘O’
for organized religion; ‘P’ for personal spirituality and practices; and ‘E’
for effects on medical care and end of life issues.”
Different
physicians will approach a patient’s spiritual needs and questions in different
manners. However this is done, physicians should remember that they have other
resources for helping patients with their religious and spiritual needs. Board-certified
chaplains have extensive training to help them meet patients’ spiritual needs.
Clergy can also be a resource. Physicians should take care to avoid certain
actions when dealing with religious and spiritual matters with patients.
Physicians should take care not to “recommend” or “prescribe” religious beliefs
to patients of a different religion or those who do not consider themselves
religious/spiritual.
Discussion of spirituality/religion, like other health practices, should be
patient-centered.
Nonetheless,
there is a delicate balance in patient care. In many cases, in-depth religious
counseling is better accomplished by trained clergy. Relating to a patient’s spirituality, on the other hand, can be as simple as
paying closer attention to your bedside manner.
Whatever
a physician’s feelings concerning spirituality and religion, the physician
should always keep in mind the simple fact that it is
a physician’s duty to care for and comfort the sick and injured. If a
patient in a time of need asks for a spiritual/religious observance or about a
spiritual issue and the physician sees that fulfilling this will bring the
patient comfort, then physicians may consider supporting these
beliefs/requests, to
the extent it is morally, ethically, and professionally acceptable to do so.
Ultimately,
physicians must find a way to reiterate that their goal is to provide the best
medical treatment possible and get the patient on board with this mission.
After all, quality care, combined with respect, compassion, and an occasional
dose of optimism is the best way to serve all patients.