Physician time is
valuable, and given the many areas of practice where physicians are in short
supply, it is increasingly rare and expensive. And while patients may prefer to
have their doctor at their side at every step of their medical treatment, there
are many aspects of care that can be handled perfectly well by trained,
advanced practitioners other than physicians. Thus has the role of advanced
practitioners—now referred to as “Advanced Practice Professionals—flourished in
the last several decades. Who these practitioners are and what they are asked
to do, however, has evolved; and now, as we face significant challenges in
supply of care delivery in the coming years, it is time again to take a close
look at how we define services that must be performed by a physician and those
that should be coordinated but not necessarily carried out by a physician or
could even be handled by an Advanced Practice Professional. (Note: They are
not just Primary Care providers.) Questions we may ask along the way include: What responsibilities have already been shifted from physicians to advanced
practitioners, and what others could be? How does this affect patient
access to care? How will it impact quality of care?
Advanced Practice
Professionals include physician assistants and all advance practice nurses,
which are comprised of nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists,
certified registered nurse anesthetists, and certified nurse midwives. They
have different educational backgrounds and different areas of expertise.
Nurse
practitioners are independent practitioners certified to diagnose and treat
chronic conditions and acute conditions. They can, often without physician
supervision, prescribe medicine in all 50 states, update charts, manage patients,
and provide counseling. They tend to specialize in pediatrics, women’s health,
acute care, family medicine, oncology, mental health, and related fields.
Additionally, they tend to be highly educated, with master’s degrees and even
doctorates.
“They really
function to supplement practices,” according to Susan Mesa, president of
AdvancedPractice.com, a health care staffing company specializing in advanced
practitioner placement. “A nurse practitioner can see about 85 percent of the
patients a physician
can see,” and patients are often willing to see an advanced practitioner such as
a nurse practitioner if only to receive treatment sooner. “You can come in today and see a
nurse practitioner in forty minutes,” says Mesa, “or wait two weeks to see the
physician.”
Physician
assistants coordinate care by working in family and general medicine, internal
medicine and their subspecialties as well as in emergency medicine, and they
even assist in surgery. All advanced practice nurses are nurses with master’s
degrees. They fall under the jurisdiction of state Boards of Nursing and can
be hospital-based. Physician assistants must graduate from an accredited
program and become certified and also fall under state licensure requirements.
As the costs and
difficulties associated with medical practice have continued to increase,
advanced practitioners have proven particularly indispensable in some
specialties, such as nephrology, where they serve as the eyes and ears of
nephrologists in outpatient dialysis units, while at the same time allowing
practices to bill for high-level MCP visits. In practice, they serve to perform
many of the duties physicians would perform, but are able to do so at a lower
cost to a practice. NPs and PAs perform physical assessments, take histories,
evaluate test results, diagnose, prescribe, and ascertain the effectiveness of
treatments and interventions, and they even do rounds in hospitals and assist
with admissions and charge of inpatients.
Of course, these
practitioners do not operate in a vacuum. Advanced Practice Professionals may
find their fortunes affected by the recently passed health insurance
legislation much to the same extent that physicians will. Experts expect that
the legislation will fuel growth in the non-physician practitioner field, as
the bill focuses on cost reduction and service efficiency. In particular, the
bill allows for greater reimbursement for services that can be performed by
advanced practitioners.
Home health care,
birth center services, preventive health services: all these are at times
performed by PAs, and all see growth in reimbursement rates under the recently
passed legislation. The nation’s advanced practitioner professional associations were very much
behind the recent health care legislation, going so far as to strongly tout
provisions of the bill and to call for the strengthening of other portions. The
American Academy of Physician Assistants called for increased access to PA
training as well as increased reimbursement and prescribing powers for PAs. The final bill took these requests into account, and physician assistants and
other APs are now eligible for higher Medicare reimbursement. Additionally,
more funds have been made available with regard to loan repayment programs and
scholarships for AP education programs. As the bill removed barriers to AP education while at the same time increasing
AP reimbursement rates, it is reasonable to conclude that the overall effect
will be an increase in the number of non-physician providers.
The
increase in the number of non-physician practitioners is likely to cause some
tensions to rise in the health care world, and we are already seeing signs of
such tensions. Increasingly, non-physician practitioners are lobbying for
expanded powers with regard to prescribing, practice, and privileges. Already,
we see the makings of turf wars between physicians and non-physician providers.
For
instance, anesthesiologists in California recently sued the state after it
announced that nurse anesthetists would be allowed to administer anesthesia
without the supervision of a physician. Meanwhile, nurse practitioners in Texas are chafing against regulations
requiring them to petition and pay local physicians to grant them “prescriptive
authority” in order to open and run a practice wherein the NP is allowed to
treat patients and prescribe medicine. The American Medical Association, for its part, has worked to protect physician
practice turf, deciding on language last year stating that doctors of nursing
practice “must practice as part of a medical team under the supervision of a
licensed physician who has final authority and responsibility for the patient.”
Representatives
for non-physician practitioner groups have, of course, pushed on with their
campaign to expand the practice capabilities of their constituencies. They’ve
seen support from other groups, such as the Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation, which
released a report calling for legal, regulatory, and reimbursement restrictions
to be loosened in order to allow greater participation by nurse practitioners
and PAs in the provision of primary care.
Characterizing all
interactions between physicians and non-physician providers as “turf war” would
be a mistake, though, according to Mesa. “Most physicians,” she says,
“recognize that advanced practitioners tend to supplement—not
supplant—physicians.” For physician assistants in particular, partnership with a physician is an
essential element of the job ingrained in them during their education.
In
the aforementioned case regarding California anesthetists, the
anesthesiologists noted that nurse anesthetists are not trained to respond to
complications from anesthesia or problems in the recovery room, situations they
claim require the talents of an experienced physician. However, financial
matters are definitely a more proximate cause in some cases.
Consider
the recent upswing in the number of retail clinics across the nation. Since
the year 2000, around 1,000 retail clinics have sprung up across the nation.
These small clinics–often located in “big box” stores such as Wal-Mart or in
large pharmacy chains such as CVS–offer simple care for common ailments at a
fraction of the cost of a visit to a doctor’s office. In theory, these
clinics–which achieve their lower costs by staffing advanced practitioners
instead of physicians–would provide a valuable service to lower income areas
with residents less likely to be able to afford physician services. However,
they tend to pop up in areas with higher income demographics than others;
encroaching upon potential clients for practices in those areas.
The
physician argument against increased capabilities for nurse practitioners and
physician assistants is easier to understand in this case: a business model
utilizing these increasingly-empowered workers would be able to undercut the
existing practice model—in price, at least, if not in range of care—possibly
with unforeseeable consequences.
Despite
resistance from physicians and hospitals, the expansion of the retail clinic
sector is unlikely to be turned back any time soon. The same is likely true
with regard to the growing role of advanced practitioners. According to the Bureau
of Labor Statistics, growth in the three advanced practitioner fields is
expected to outpace growth in most other segments of the economy. In 2008,
there were 158,348 nurse practitioners in this country, up 12 percent from just
four years previous.
In
2008, there were 74,800 physician assistant jobs in the U.S. That is expected
to increase by 39 percent by the year 2018. Just as their numbers continue to increase, so, too, do their ranges of
practice. Illustrating the gradually increasing capabilities of non-physician
providers, a bill was introduced recently in the House of Representatives to
allow physician assistants to diagnose and treat federal employees who are
injured on the job.
In
light of the steadily growing number and capabilities of non-physician
providers, some would argue that the best route for physicians and hospitals to
take moving forward would be to more fully integrate them into the health care
world, rather than resisting the spread of their influence. As the nation faces
a physician shortage at a time when health care workers are most needed,
non-physician providers can alleviate some of the pressures on the industry by
providing a highly-skilled and cost-effective alternative to physicians.
AdvancedPractice.com’s
Susan Mesa sees increased integration as a key component moving forward.
“Nobody’s got a crystal ball,” she notes, “but a lot of moving parts in the
industry could come to bear in a number of ways. For instance, increasing adoption
of the medical home model--coupled with advances in tele-medicine--could lead
to a future in which physicians interact remotely with patients who are being
served locally by nurse practitioners.” Studies have found that nurse practitioners are equally adept at diagnosing
ailments and caring for patients, with some even showing that nurse
practitioners are better at listening to patients than their physician
counterparts.
Particular
sectors of the health care world are ahead of the curve with regard to AP
integration, according to Mesa: “Government facilities–Veterans Administration
hospitals and such–lead the way. They’re ahead of the curve when it comes to
[AP integration] because it’s such a cost saver. Also psychiatry... People
might not realize the popularity of the use of [psychiatric nurse
practitioners] in psychiatric care.”
The health care
world is in a period of considerable flux, with demographic, financial, and
legislative pressures all coming to bear upon the industry. In the face of
this, perhaps advanced practitioners represent a solid, albeit partial,
solution to some of the nation’s health care woes. If such is the case, the way
forward would be a greater integration of these providers into the existing
model rather than resistance to maintain the status quo.